Jump to content

Talk:UEFA Euro 2008 final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleUEFA Euro 2008 final is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starUEFA Euro 2008 final is part of the UEFA European Championship finals series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 16, 2021.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 22, 2021Good article nomineeListed
September 11, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
October 25, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 2, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Spain's win in the UEFA Euro 2008 Final was the first of three successive major tournament victories?
Current status: Featured article

Thanks "PeeJay2 for updating

[edit]

This Pic now belongs to where it rightly fits :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goutamkhandelwal (talkcontribs) 11:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Great job with the update

[edit]

Wow, this is what I call real-time update! Thanks to everyone who edited. Kushal (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean me? – PeeJay 20:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics Section Vandalized

[edit]

Clean it up. 67.85.190.202 (talk) 20:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weather

[edit]

The source provided says the weather was sunny. Sunset was at 20:59 CET on the day of the game and kick-off was at 20:45 (approx), so that is probably accurate as of the start of the match. As User:Amakuru points out, most of the game was played at nighttime, so "sunny" isn't accurate for the whole match, but we don't have a source for the whole match, so we should stick with what we've got. – PeeJay 11:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay: I'm not that fussed about it, it just looked odd to me to be describing a night-time game as "sunny". The source for that is a pre-match factsheet dated 19:35, so more than an hour before kick-off. And from this YouTube video there is no evidence of sunshine at the kick-off (around 7 seconds in). My guess is the sun would have been low on the horizon at that point, and not high enough to reach the field of play past the stands. I'm all for WP:Verifiability not truth, but it doesn't seem right to say the game was sunny when it clearly was played under floodlights with no hint of sun on the field.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, fair enough, just wanted to start a discussion anyway. I don't know if what I'm seeing in that YouTube video is the roof of the stadium or the sky, but it looks like it's still at least fairly bright. Not a blue sky, definitely reddish, but not dark. Maybe there's a published source out there that can tell us reliably what the weather was like during the bulk of the match. – PeeJay 12:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:UEFA Euro 2008 Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 19:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

General

[edit]

(UTC)

Review meta comments

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk09:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Spain's win in the UEFA Euro 2008 Final was the first of three successive major tournament victories? Source: BBC Sport, July 2012: "Spain have now won the last two European Championships and the last World Cup in South Africa"
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

5x expanded by Amakuru (talk). Self-nominated at 14:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi Amakuru, review follows: article passed as GA on 22 July; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing form a spotcheck; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Can't see any issues here - Dumelow (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]