Jump to content

Talk:Tzimisce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rating scale

[edit]

As to the quality scale, I would say this article is a C. It needs to have the intro shortened, the references cited (more than one! Clans always have lots of info books!) and to be rewritten in an "out of character" style.

As to importance, I looked at things like a hierarchy as the article said to do- Vampire: The Masquerade (top), Clans in V:TM (high), Bloodlines in V:TM (Mid). As Tzimise is a Clan and in V:TM Clans are crucial to the game, it's high.

--Lamoxlamae (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tzimisce of Note

[edit]
  • So are we going to include only 'canon' Tzimisce of Note, or are all those kewl characters ever created also allowed? This last point would be contentious, as a. They are part of the world of darkness, but b. may cause a very long list of characters all those people not familiar with your chronicle have never heard of...
I'd say only canon Tzimisce. --Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 07:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Explanation and Disagreement about Merging and / or Deletion

[edit]

The "Clans" in Vampire are equivalent to the character classes in Dungeons and Dragons, they are NOT just a story element. As wiki deems fit to allow the character classes of Dungeons and Dragons to have their own articles (Bard (Dungeons & Dragons), etc), there is no reason why the "character classes" of another exceedingly popular pen-and-paper RPG are not notable enough to have their own articles. Even more so since they ARE both Character Classes AND major elements of the story.

In addition, considering the large amounts of background info and game-based info on each of the clans, it is NOT feasible to merge them all into one article. In fact, if we were to do so the resulting article would be too big and then go against Wiki standards.

Please stop listing all Vampire:The Masquerade articles as non-notable.Flygongengar (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]