Talk:Tyrannosauropus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tyrannosauropus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conversion to an article

The recent conversion of this redirect to an article seems to be based on a mis-reading of the sources. They say that the tracks found in Australia and identified as "Tyrannosauropus" (a mis-spelling of Tyrannosauripus according to Paleofile) are not this ichnogenus, and so need to be given another name. This source says "we need to re-name the large Lark Quarry tracks Amblydactlyus cf. A. gethingi". So I believe that the content that replaced the redirect needs to be put in a new article at Amblydactlyus (if this is the right spelling – but should it be "Amblydactylus", which exists?) with appropriate changes. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now convinced the created article already existed at Amblydactylus. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just leaving a note here for any later editors to say that this issue was resolved over at the Wiki:Project talk page, and that although the original conversion content was not accurate, conversion to its own article was nonetheless appropriate. DrawingDinosaurs (talk | contribs) 21:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]