Jump to content

Talk:Type 97 automatic cannon/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 00:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

[edit]
  • Well-written:
  • With the issues below addressed and satisfied, the article satisfies the MOS policies for grammar, as well as structure and layout. To the point that the words have become unintelligible. (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  • Though relying on a small list of publications at present, the article contains a bibliography of reliable sources that it makes good and frequent use of. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:
  • The article seems to satisfactorily cover all relevant aspects of its topic. No trivial or fluffy text in sight. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  • The article maintains a neutral approach to its subject. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Since at least October 2007, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similarly disruptive behaviours. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  • The article's sole image at this time is public domain, and performs a most definitely relevant purpose as an illustration of the topic of the article. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    Comments

    [edit]
    Okay, that sounds good. To the point that the words have become unintelligible. (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The article satisfies the GA criteria, and is passed. Congratulations! To the point that the words have become unintelligible. (talk) 04:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]