Talk:Single-layer materials

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What's with all the "http://www.kurzweilai.net/" links? Can we link to SERIOUS scientific journals websites and not pseudo-scientific sites? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.173.135 (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revamping Boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide subsections and adding a new "borocarbonitride" section

Hi. Would it be ok for me to revamp the boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide subsections? While there are articles about hexagonal boron nitride and molybdenum sulfide as a whole, those articles and the sections in this article do not have much information concerning the 2D structure and properties.

In addition, I'd like to add a section on borocarbonitride, which is considered to be a new 2D material of its own, as it is not quite graphene and not quite boron nitride.

Thank you. Xekutorp (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free, be bold, none of Wikipedia's pages about 2D materials, graphene, van der waals heterotructures, etc, are particularly complete or well written, all need lots of improvents. --Yikkayaya (talk) 16:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two-dimensional materials → Two-dimensional material – WP:SINGULAR standard for article names Prisencolin (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was thinking, can it be considered an exception of WP:SINGULAR as per WP:PLURAL "Articles that actually distinguish among multiple distinct instances of related items can be sensibly given a plural title when the alternative would be to create an inappropriately large number of short articles, one on each instance"? Less Unless (talk) 10:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move, agree with comment: the article title can be plural because the article lists several distinct things. CyreJ (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move. I also agree with comment. Blue.painting (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.