Talk:Turtle pie

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Notability and references

I added the notability tag because the current references do not establish the subject's notability. The references appear to include a blog and some sales sites for the product, but no sort of independent, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- rvd temporarily to give creator time to improve refs Atlantic306 (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Atlantic306: The whole reason I tagged it for notability rather than nominated for some form of deletion was to give the contributor (or anyone else) a chance to improve references. Removing the tag implies that you have reason to think the subject is notable, ideally because you know of some source that can used to establish it. I'm not going to put it back on, since I don't want a dispute with you, but in my opinion you're doing it wrong. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate websites are to show they sell them.

Don't get to worried about the company websites I put on here, all they show is that they sell them. --Wyatt850 (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed those references according to WP:REFSPAM and WP:ELNO. We do not cite web pages whose primary purpose is to sell a product. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]