Jump to content

Talk:Turkish Riviera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

i think we need more quality photos for the article.anybody who have any holiday photos in Turkey please upload.

Comment removed from the article text in 2010-10-05 23:26 UTC

[edit]
Moved from Turkish Riviera

--- No, hell no. The Daphne myth took place in ancient Daphne near Antioch, and this is attested in many mythological contexts. Please do not try to credit each and every natural beauty or historical landmarks to Antalya or specific touristic destinations in southwestern Turkey. Are you a travel agent lodging European tourists somewhere there or what? So, to summarize: Ancient Daphne myth was not supposed to take place near Antalya, the place was Daphne in Antioch (Antioch-ad-Orontes, present Antakya). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.30.26.15 (talkcontribs) 04:17, 3 October 2010

--Stegop (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oludeniz03.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Oludeniz03.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Turkish Riviera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Turkish Riviera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

The images can be included in respective articles. There is no need for an excessive gallery of images of the islands in the article of the Turkish Riviera. Images should be included within the text. This is also according to WP:IG and WP:NOTIMAGEParadise Chronicle (talk) 16:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in WP:IG: "A gallery section may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text".
Though, the amount of pictures is too much (but thats my personal taste), so I will trim it accordingly. Randam (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Randam, as to my account there are still way too many images there. Also after your edit. I agree to include Galleries in the articles about architecture, museums or artists. And to include images in the body. Also the images included in the gallery do not even include the ones of the seven world wonders of the ancient world described in the article and are repetitive in the location. See a well crafted gallery at the Women's suffrage in New Zealand article. I think also the amount of images used there is much more appropriate to the article. I will leave you with reorganizing.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]