Talk:TurboGears

Inter-framework linking

I have, in the past, removed links from this page to the article about Django, and links to this page from the article about Django, on the grounds that these links are redundant; the category link for "web application frameworks" offers a much more complete and much more maintainable listing.

Is there a pressing reason to keep adding links to specific frameworks despite this? Ubernostrum 00:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raising this question again; I've once again pruned links from the Django article, explaining on the talk page that it's much more efficient just to rely on the link to the frameworks category. Is there a pressing need to duplicate this information in this article? Ubernostrum 04:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, shouldn't Ruby and Struts also be removed?

I'd think so, but I haven't had time to scrupulously police these things and I was hoping to wait until some sort of consensus had been reached. Ubernostrum 16:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Django is the mindshare leader in the Python web frameworks and could be second most popular web framework behind Ruby on Rails, so other web frameworks are often compared to Django (and RoR) to see it is worth learning TG when you already know Django. Thus it would be useful to see Django mentioned in TG page in the context of comparing TG to the market leader (or mindshare leader). Just like Linux is often compared to Windows and MacOSX directly not leaving the comparison up to 'operating systems' category. Aigarius (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typographical error in article text

This article contains the phrase "in the rose of" which seems to be a typo.