Jump to content

Talk:Tulsa Golden Hurricane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NCs?

[edit]

I'm pretty sure Tulsa has not won two national championships in men's basketball (having written the Tulsa Golden Hurricane men's basketball article). Does anyone know what sport that's actually supposed to be? matt91486 (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they have. But, not NCAA. NIT. This is even on their website.↔NMajdantalk 21:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, an NIT championship is a national championship. -steventity (talk) 01:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's terribly misleading to call NIT championships as national championships. National championships generally refer to the NCAA tournament. For the sake of general clarification, it's better to just say NIT championships, because it will be misinterpreted. Regardless of the NIT being technically correct as a national championship, we all know it's not really. matt91486 (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split Football section?

[edit]

Should the football section be split into its own article, like has been done for the men's basketball team? Cardsplayer4life (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Most other universities have a separate article for football that stand on their own. It would be nice to see tables and charts with recent records, regular season and in-conference performance, bowl games, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.232.67 (talk) 18:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and split it. It seems as if none of the editors would be bothered by that. Heck, maybe I'll just do 'er Madmaxmarchhare (talk) 19:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Totally Agree

[edit]

I think that winning programs should have a separate section for their football program. Tables for stats would be nice considering that Tulsa has put up ridiculous stats the past few years.

Im an asian 04:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Im an asian (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tulsa Golden Hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]