Talk:Tucana/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 14:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be conducting this GA review. Please be patient! Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, cool -take your time ;) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is easily a good article. I made about a half-dozen minor edits to spelling, grammar, linking, etc. I don't see anything else that sticks out which needs work to meet the GA criteria. Good job, and congratulations! Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 14:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·