Talk:Tualatin station/GA2
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 14:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
To try and expedite this, it comes off comments from the first GA review I did, and all in all is based on improvements made since then.
- Style
- Several layers of copyediting both from GOCE and main editor.
- The lead unfortunately now seems too long for the length of article, as it now reads as longer than it was before due to para 2 being broken up. Three paragraphs is probably too many. They are well written though, but the last sentence of the first para seems unnecessary, so it could be shortened here. Attention
- All issues from review 1 have been fixed.
- Overall
- Beyond that, a read suggests it's satisfactory for GA - meets requirements, appropriate encyclopedic quality. Kingsif (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for re-reviewing this, Kingsif. I've addressed your attn by merging the last two paragraphs. The MAX Light Rail connection s/o is important because it is the region's primary mode of public transport. WES was built to supplement it. Thanks again for the review and GA! --Truflip99 (talk) 16:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)