Talk:Tropical Storm Olivia (2006)

Tropical Storm Olivia (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
April 8, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Tropical Storm Olivia in 2006 was the eighth tropical cyclone to receive the name Olivia in the Eastern Pacific ocean?

Current status: Delisted good article

Todo[edit]

~~Link miles and km in the lead and first paragraph~~
~~Link wind shear in the first paragraph~~
~~"degenerated into a remnant on October 13." Missing word and~~ link needed for remnant low.
~~"occurred while the storm was located to the south, and later to the southwest, of the Cape Verde Islands." Maybe just saying as it passed to the south of the Cape Verde Islands would be better~~
~~Just as a note, you use Convection in four consecutive sentences near the end of the first body paragraph~~
"The remnant low moved towards the east-southeast, and on October 15 it was absorbed into the remnants of Tropical Storm Norman (2006);" Err...I don't really need to say what's wrong with this one right?

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done with most of that, but I'm not sure what's wrong with that last sentence. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the date that Norman dissipated and then compare it to that sentance lolJason Rees (talk) 03:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry? –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I missed that one, I meant the link, but Hink fixed that. Norman dissipated on the 15th, so how can it absorb a system when it dissipates? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what the TCR says. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got everything. :-) What's needed for B-Class? –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 03:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good to me, it's B-class now :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-breaking spaces should be added. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expand the section in the main article when you create an article. Potapych (talk) 20:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. This article is a fork of the main article. It's existence is justified if there is too much information to put in one small section. As far as I can tell, no one even touched the section on Olivia. Potapych (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I did not touch Olivia's section, as there is no need. Why would the section need to be expanded? If anything, it should be shortened. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't. It's only four short sentences with no references. It should be a developed summary. Potapych (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm delisting this article from GA status, since I no longer believe it meets notability criteria. I was the original author of the article. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]