Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleTropical Storm Ingrid (2007) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 1, 2011[[==GA Reassessment==
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
I am delisting the article to merge the article. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)|Good article nominee]][reply]		Not listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Merging histories?[edit]

With the long debate by Hmwith, he decided in the end to cut-and-paste...is there any way the histories can be merged? (Same with Jerry and Melissa once they get moved) CrazyC83 (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Todo[edit]

I'd like some info from StormCarib to be included (link). While it may not be official, it still provides some impact, which is not currently mentioned. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added that. Juliancolton (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When adding information, please make sure it flows with the article. --Hurricanehink (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I just wanted to add that in, and then make it better once I found more info. Juliancolton (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA it? Juliancolton (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. The lede is very awkward, and there are multiple typos. Please learn to more coherently, and try and spell-check your work ;) --Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I copy it, and then paste it on a spell checker on word perfect. It showed no mistakes. I will check again. Juliancolton (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And just so I can learn better: what makes the lede awkward? Juliancolton (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Calling depressions by their numbers, saying that a tropical wave intensified into a tropical depression, phrases like on the 13. The whole becoming a depression first but storm later could be clearer. --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Any better? Juliancolton (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
GAC? Juliancolton (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No. Please copyedit it. I counted several spelling and grammar errors. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Juliancolton (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Article's lead was consulted on IRC, User:Juliancolton fixed it. Thanks to him and CrazyC83, this article meets all criteria.Mitch32contribs 21:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

I just noticed that the only impact from the storm was included in a blog, which isn't exactly reliable. Having removed that, the article is just info from the NHC, which brings it notability into question. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, high-quality, at least till I see how much content would be in the season article if merged. YE Pacific Hurricane
It was already merged into the AHS article and it fits quite comfortably in there atm.Jason Rees (talk) 01:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tropical_Storm_Ingrid_(2007)&oldid=1137269171"