Talk:Tropical Storm Bernard/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "With less than optimal conditions for development, the JTWC assessed the chances of the low developing into a tropical cyclone within 24 hours as "poor"" - Remove this paragraph as it doesnt add anything to the article and is unoffical
- It's useful to the article in determining the state of the low Cyclonebiskit 15:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- I would like to see piped links in the references to Meteo France and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center
- Who are Meteo France? - you do not state within the article what they have to do with the SWIO
- Shouldnt you also include a link to sea surface temperatures?
- Their are a couple of statements that arent referenced.
- Which ones? I don't see any that are unreferenced Cyclonebiskit 15:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Just a couple of things that should be easily fixed so im placing this GAN on hold Jason Rees (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Ok evreythings been sorted now so im passing this article Jason Rees (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)