Talk:Tropical Storm Becky (1970)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 21:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. My only comment would be that in most places you use convert templates, but I noticed one place in the MH section where you didn't, so you probably want to make this consistent. Other than that, nice work, and congrats on another GA! Dana boomer (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. About the metric conversion in the MH, {{convert}} is discouraged when displaying wind speeds for tropical cyclones, as the NHC wind speeds are rounded to the nearest 5 units (knots, miles, or kilometers). –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

I didn't realize that - you learn something new every day! Thanks for the note. Dana boomer (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)