Talk:Tropical Storm Agatha (1992)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what's "10 direct"?
- It states that 10 people died from the hurricane directly, it is in most WP:WPTC articles.
"As it moved ~~northbound~~ northwards" northbound is an adjective, but we need an adverb.
- Done Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Agatha ~~was~~ steered toward the north"
- Fixed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A bit picky, but I suggest "and ~~stayed~~ remained at sea"
FN 6, why's "National Hurricane Center" italicised while others above and below it aren't.
- Beause that ref is a template
"The center of the storm promptly became ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" I don't get the "ill-defined on infrared satellite imagery" part.
- Changed to poorly. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does "forecasters" need to be wikified?
- Why not? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"heavy rains" redirects to a video game. I don't think it should be wikified at all, since it's not technical.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Mexico" and "landfall" are wikified multiple times.
- I don' think they are in the same section. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Gased Times" should be formatted as The Gadsden Times.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The News" should be italicised.
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane
date formatting should follow one style, either YMD or DMY.
- I made it in DMY to be consistent with other WP:EPAC articles. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dablinks reveals two occurrences of dabs.
- Fixed the first and the second is project standards to have. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

End note

No major problems. Very happy. Pass Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 04:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]