Talk:Trophic cascade

Fisheries and Fishing B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology High‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

I have been rewriting this page extensively, and decided it needed a talk page (so I could talk to myself, perhaps...). Feel free to make suggestions or revisions. Cheers, Justinleif 02:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page could benefit from one or two diagrams illustrating classic examples of trophic cascades. It would make it easier for people to visualize the concept. Luzingit (talk) 17:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The myth of the Wolf/Yellowstone park trophic cascade could be addressed. I am not good at adding links so someone else can maybe. In summary, wolves only account for a small percentage of Elk kills. There are many other predators. Also, water plays probably a more important role in the growth of willows. This comes from Utah State University ecologist Dan McNulty and Colorado State University's Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory professor Tom Hobbs. https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/scientists-debunk-myth-that-yellowstone-wolves-changed-entire-ecosystem-flow-of-rivers/70004699 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPKowal (talk • contribs) 19:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/trophic-cascades-across-diverse-plant-ecosystems-80060347. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 05:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bad figure needs to be fixed

The image with the deer and wolves at the bottom of the article is incorrect. Deer cannot reach the top of tall trees. When there is no predator they eat the bottom branches until they cant reach any higher. The figure as it is is wrong.

Added content

Edited to include information regarding trophic cascades and their effect on atmospheric carbon fluxes. 00:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Daltonce1 (talk)