Talk:Trojan Ballistics Suit of Armor

Invention Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Canadian / North America / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Um, slight design flaw, but how does one take a leak while wearing this suit? 65.121.141.34 (talk) 13:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At a guess, the same way you do in a flight suit or space suit ... you fit yourself with a urine collector. 31.185.130.185 (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pepper Spray versus insurgents

Isn't the "legality" of using a pepper spray against insurgents a non-issue? As unlawful combatants they surely don't have protection of privilege and can be targeted with chemical agents as freely as a common criminal... 31.185.130.185 (talk) 21:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source on doubts of efficacy

The first section talks about"strong evidence that it is not, in fact, functional," but the references linked to are just articles promoting the armor. While the lack of major sales is suggestive that such evidence exists, I can't seem to find it. If a source cannot be found, I suggest we remove this line. 184.63.79.136 (talk) 19:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sales could also indicate an inability to mass-produce the armor, which would also limit the number of buyers. BorkBorkGoesTheCode (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]