Jump to content

Talk:Tristan Emmanuel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Recent developments

[edit]

I have removed an entire paragraph that is based on a supposed quote about "Sexual Deviancy". The underlying quote for this is from an politically charged NDP press release, released in the middle of a poltically charged debate - and as noted in the paragraph removed Emmanuel disputes ever having said this.

In the absence of a reputable source for a disputed quote, and when the source of the quote denies he ever said it, it seems unfair and libelous to continue to post the smear in Wikipedia. The other citiations here, that repeat that smear, are similarly only valid if the original quote is valid, which has not been proven.

If the Wikipedia project is to succeed it must not be used by activists to smear people. It appears that in the case of Mr. Emmanuel the opposite has occurred and his bio as posted appears to be written by activists focused on their issues, and it is not a fair representation of his career.

DowntownK (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair representation in an encyclopedia is not to change "opposition to same-sex marriage", which is accurate and neutral wording, to "championing traditional marriage". I saw the source for "sexual deviants". That was Mr. Emmanuel's own writing. If Mr. Emmanuel feels the quotes have been taken out of context, please give them context here. If sources are disputed, I believe you would argue to have them removed completely, as opposed to arguing they are only no good as sources for negative information. Lastly, when using terms like "libel" in edit summaries and "libelous" here, it is important to fully understand the definition of that legal term. If you are inclined to suggest this may become a legal matter, you should first read WP:LEGAL. Lara 16:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tristan Emmanuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]