Talk:Trinity College Dublin/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ó Maoil Súilleabháin (talk · contribs) 20:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to fail this: the article has large numbers of unsourced statements, and the sourcing isnt very great; some of the stuff in Further reading should be integrated, as opposed to various websites and primary sources. Additionally, the nominator has an extremely small percentage of authorship for the article (about 0.6%), and there hasn't been any conversation on the talk page whether to nominate it. I appreciate the interest in the GAN process, but do read through the Good Article criteria thoroughly before renominating, and look at some academic institution articles which have passed. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.