Talk:Triconex

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article appears to be plagued with advertising-speak. Salvageable?

It appears that this article is in violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING. I only really noticed this after placing the "More citations needed" template. Can this article be fixed, or should it be sent to AfD? Is the company notable? I'm not sure myself. DesertPipeline (talk) 12:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the above concerns, the article is too immersed within the speciality area within which the company operates to be intelligible to the general public. It name checks a number of people who are note widely known outside of this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurence Cuffe (talk • contribs) 13:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]