Talk:Tribal Gear
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
This article only has WP:SPS and WP:SECONDARY refs about the company and thus fails Notability. --triwbe (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
A quick search (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) finds enough sources, please inlcude the reliable ones in the article. --triwbe (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy request
[edit]I was hesitant to speedy the article since it a) has quite a lot of info, b) is sourced (though that needs improvement) and c) wasn't totally an advert. It needs help, to be sure, but I don't think it's blatant advertising. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
The article is a puff-piece that describes the founder, philosophy, and the artists, but fundamentally nothing about the company's reach, success in actually selling product, profitability, or any of the other traditional indicia of corporate notability. I have no view as to whether those factors--if included--will give rise to a presumption of notability, but they certainly haven't been, despite the article having been around for quite some time. Obviously, improvement would be preferable to deletion, so I will tag the article with some relevant concerns. Bongomatic (talk) 02:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)