Talk:Triaenops menamena/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Just two comments

• angular process is red-linked and unexplained
  • Added a little explanation.
• In the lead, you illustrate the sizes with wing lengths — I'd expect total length to be the more obvious figure, but I know nothing about bats.
  • In bats, forearm length is among the most prominent measurements. I can also replace it with total length if needed, though; it's already in the table. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: