Talk:Trey Burke/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. I'll probably be able to finish it within the next few days. Moisejp (talk) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

No disambiguation links or dead links. Moisejp (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, follows MOS,

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Refs all check out, no OR.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad and focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Very good article. Congratulations! It is now a GA. Moisejp (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)