Talk:Tree of life (biology)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Boca Jóvenes (talk · contribs) 14:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Looks as if it's been waiting a long time. Hope to be back soon. BoJó | talk UTC 14:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Looking forward to it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This passes very easily. It is well-written, educational and interesting. The sourcing and citations are fine; the illustrations are appropriate and useful to the reader; the coverage is within scope and, though I'm by no means an expert on the subject, I'd say the article is complete. The only things I could think of that might help the reader a bit were two subject links I've added (embryology and paleontology). It might be worth checking to see if there are other terms where a link might help but, really, it would just be fine-tuning. This is not so much a good article as an excellent article and I'm promoting it to WP:GA. Congratulations and well done. BoJó | talk UTC 14:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review, and for adding the links! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)