Talk:Treaty of Butre

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Treaty of Butre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Treaty of Butre has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 29, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
June 1, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Ghana Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ghana (assessed as Low-importance).

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: African / Dutch / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Treaty of Butre (1656)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Greetings! I've decided to review this to the best of my possibilities, and I even researched the topic to see if I could find more information - so, I know how difficult this topic is to write on. I think for the most part this article meets good article standards, but here are some things that are of my own preference and you may or may not agree with them. Please note, that I won't 'fail' the article for you not agreeing with me and my opinion will change as you offer me your own opinions. But, here they are:

I know that you don't want to go off-topic too much, but I think the Background section could be improved. Personally, I don't like paragraph structures where they're short and the section contains many paragraphs, but I admit this is a personal point of view and I don't believe the Manual of Style supports me. Then again, the article already has a lot of background compared to the treaty, so it's up to you and you see how you could improve it. Perhaps it can be split into 'background', then have the 'contents' section and then have 'effects of the treaty' below; or something of that nature. It would certainly make the article a bit longer and more in depth (which is what is important). Currently, the background also includes information post-treaty, which wouldn't really be background information. Perhaps this calls for a fourth section titled 'British take-over', or something like that, and explains a little about the treaty when the Dutch transferred the territories to the British.
In my opinion, the list style under 'content' is not very attractive and perhaps it would be better to make that section into paragraphs. Each paragraph would deal with the subject matter that the bold currently emphasises. In effect, it would be similar, but without the bolded words at the beginning of each paragraph.

These are just suggestions, and I will promote the article. Good luck! JonCatalan (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will look into the suggestions. They are very valuable. Also because they contribute to the development of a format for smaller treaties. Michel Doortmont (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]