Talk:Treaty House

New Zealand: Politics / Māori Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Māori task force.

Untitled

Added some not very good pics - feel free to replace with better. Winstonwolfe 03:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still a stub?

I think this now has enough content not to be a stub. There's not a lot more that could be added without it getting boring. --Helenalex 07:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and have removed the stub notices and replaced them with categories. I also moved the material on the Kanagawa Treaty house to its own stub article.-gadfium 18:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated title

There are a number of other references to Treaty house in Wikipedia which do not refer to the New Zealand one (use "What links here" to find them). I feel that because the New Zealand building is a key part of New Zealand's national history, it deserves to get the disambiguated title, but there may need to be a general article on the concept of a treaty house.-gadfium 18:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a concept of a treaty house - surely it is just a house in which or outside or which a treaty was signed. This page could be 'treaty house' or 'Waitangi treaty house' - I think either could be found easily by people looking for it. --Helenalex 22:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of agree with both of you - with Helenalex that there is no concept of a Treaty House, and with gadfium that the most common propoer name for this building is Treaty House, and therefore that should be the article's title, (disambiguity pending). Winstonwolfe 03:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Waitangi Treaty Grounds

As the article covers the Waitangi Treaty Grounds in general and its other features, I suggest the article be moved to Waitangi Treaty Grounds (capitalised, as it seems to be the proper name). Nurg (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't support that. Waitangi Treaty Grounds is notable all by itself and if anybody is so inclined, the material can be split and a separate article started. Schwede 66 21:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]