Talk:Travelers (The X-Files)

Travelers (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Travelers (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 5) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 23, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Psuedonym

Arthur Dales was also a psuedonym used by writers on The Adventures of Robin Hood tv series in the 1950's, don't suppose its worth mentioning.81.111.124.190 (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right! Added.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Travelers (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 21:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

flashback does not need to be spaced.

References

1997–18 should be 1997–98

Production

Should it be eluded under "but he again alluded the staff"? Be sure to double check here.
"humanly possibly" → "humanly possible"
The sentence "McGavin had originally been casting directors' first choice for the role of Senator Matheson..." needs a ref.

Otherwise, no issues with sourcing and imaging. On hold. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I believe I have addressed all the issues. Good catch with the allude v. elude thing!--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]