Talk:Travancore Cochin Republican Praja Party
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Travancore Cochin Republican Praja Party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]In terms of notability, we'd normally consider a political party winning 1.56% of votes nationwide as sufficiently notable for having an article. Now considering that Kerala has a population bigger than a lot of sovereign countries, I'd say that 1.56% state-wide would suffice. --Soman (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Soman, there is no such rule. Based on my experiences on AfD, a political party needs to win more than a few electoral seats before it passes the individual notability criteria. If that is not met it is almost always deleted unless there are good merge targets (like founder's bio) available DBigXrayᗙ 19:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'd say our opinion on what is the established practice differs. The notability guidelines and policies are instruments that are supposed to help us from having Wikipedia full of vanity pages, for example not every branch of Domino's Pizza or similar should have an article. Whilst this article is a stub and covers a subject from way before google and world wide web, it has information on a passage of history of relevance for those interested in politics of Travancore-Cochin state. Deletion or merge will bring no benefit to the quality of Wikipedia. --Soman (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Soman, Please understand that the notability does not depend on the current article size or condition. If it is notable, even a stub will be permitted. If it is not, even ef you write 200 KB of text, it will be deleted simply because the notability is not met. If you still disagree with me, then we can let the AfD decide its notability. That is the only option left in that case. DBigXrayᗙ 19:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'd say our opinion on what is the established practice differs. The notability guidelines and policies are instruments that are supposed to help us from having Wikipedia full of vanity pages, for example not every branch of Domino's Pizza or similar should have an article. Whilst this article is a stub and covers a subject from way before google and world wide web, it has information on a passage of history of relevance for those interested in politics of Travancore-Cochin state. Deletion or merge will bring no benefit to the quality of Wikipedia. --Soman (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Stub-Class political party articles
- Unknown-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- Politics articles needing infoboxes
- Wikipedia requested images of politics
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Kerala articles
- Low-importance Kerala articles
- Stub-Class Kerala articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Kerala articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Kerala
- Stub-Class Indian politics articles
- Low-importance Indian politics articles
- Stub-Class Indian politics articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian politics articles
- India articles without infoboxes
- Wikipedia requested photographs in India
- WikiProject India articles