Talk:Trapping mechanisms for carbon geosequestration

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted because the premise for deletion is actually incorrect. This article creates the existing links for the risk mitigation issues related to Carbon capture and storage and Carbon sequestration. The information provides information many readers should consider of great importance: If CO2 is removed from the atmosphere or prevented from entering the atmosphere from power plants and related facilities and stored underground as a way to prevent global warming on our planet, how do you prevent the said carbon dioxide from leaking from the underground storage?

For example, the carbon sequestration article mentioned in the Speedy Deletion filing has a subsection Underground storage in suitable geologic formations, this article provides the links for structural and mineral trapping. As in other articles, explaining these processes can take away from the carbon sequestration article the ease of reading the main ideas. The links explain the ideas in another without making the carbon sequestration article lengthy.

This article provides a service for those who want to know more about trapping mechanism for risk mitigation as carbon dioxide is stored underground in the process of reducing global warming. It definitely should not be deleted.Starlighsky (talk) 11:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is different from sequestration, enough different to merit it's own article. I am therefore deleting the speedy deletion. I think the article will survive an AfD, particularly as it is being expanded upon. Sufficient notability. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 00:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

I want to add that this article is opposite of what is claimed in the deletion banner. The risk management procedures mentioned in this article provide a source of information for the terms that link to this article from Carbon capture and storage and related articles. --Starlighsky (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]