Talk:Transsexual News Telegraph
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sourcing
[edit]I'll freely confess to not being a Wiki expert, but I was briefly the editor of TNT, the subject of the article, and know about as much as anybody except Gail about it. I dont' think there's anything particularly controversial about what I've said here, it's pretty much dry facts about TNT, and I've cited sources where appropriate.
But, it seems silly to cite a magazine as a source in a page about a magazine. So, for example, I have no cite about the back covers, but if you look at a pile of back issues of TNT you'll see the back covers. What constitutes published research about a magazine? Anyone with a copy of the magazine can read it, anyone else can't check a quote anyway.
Although little has been published specifically about TNT, anyone reading gender theory will find numerous references to the zine. So it's difficult to find appropriate references, yet it seems unarguably a useful article.