Talk:Transsexual News Telegraph

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Sourcing

I'll freely confess to not being a Wiki expert, but I was briefly the editor of TNT, the subject of the article, and know about as much as anybody except Gail about it. I dont' think there's anything particularly controversial about what I've said here, it's pretty much dry facts about TNT, and I've cited sources where appropriate.

But, it seems silly to cite a magazine as a source in a page about a magazine. So, for example, I have no cite about the back covers, but if you look at a pile of back issues of TNT you'll see the back covers. What constitutes published research about a magazine? Anyone with a copy of the magazine can read it, anyone else can't check a quote anyway.

Although little has been published specifically about TNT, anyone reading gender theory will find numerous references to the zine. So it's difficult to find appropriate references, yet it seems unarguably a useful article.

--Anniepoo 10:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]