Talk:Transport Phenomena (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criticism

Although the book was an amazing tour de force it also created a new trend in the mathematical analysis of chemical engineering systems. Chemical engineering appeared to be adopted by people who wanted an excuse to do mathematics, and lost sight of the practical focus - or, at least, the easy adoption of the practical output of their work. Rutherford Aris was a leading light in this, producing works of great beauty and analysis, but which then required intermediates to turn the results into something that the wider chemical engineering community could use.

(This was an edit made to the article text by 194.201.81.254 ... and later moved here to the discussion page by mbeychok 16:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Why does "Transport theory" redirect here?

I was redirected to this page while looking for information on transport theory as a whole. Why is it that this entire subject is redirected to a single book on the matter? Is this an oversight? --Yottaly (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Just to clarify, I was redirected from the page titled "Transport theory (statistical physics)". --Yottaly (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Transport Phenomena redirected to the general topic at Transport phenomena. Not clear that the book is primary topic compared to the general concept, and disambiguating the two solely by a difference in case is doomed. Favonian (talk) 13:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transport Phenomena (book) → Transport Phenomena – Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Dab is not necessary since other page is not named in the same case. Pascal Hacutin (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support move back to original title. No need for parentheses. Already redirects back here anyway. Station1 (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't move, redirect the one without (book) to the physics concept and provide a hatnote on that page. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Transport Phenomena (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]