Talk:Transnational progressivism

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this an actual political movement?

Is this an actual political movement, or just a term coined by John Fonte to describe a perceived political trend? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 05:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sources have Fonte describing it as an "ideology." I've changed the lede to be consistent with this.EastTN (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of the examples of attempts to change modern historical national narratives section

IMO this section is an example of the association fallacy, and should be removed and replaced with an examples section which is limited to examples of transnational progressivism which demonstrate most or all of the seven core beliefs outlined in the previous section. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and have removed this section, as it consisted of original research. An examples section should only include examples which have been specifically referred to as cases of transnational progressivism. Robofish (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Transnational progressivism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can this be trimmed?

This article at the moment seems like a blow-by-blow description of pretty much anything that's been written about "Transnational Progressivism," and something of an advertisement for John Fonte as well. Why does an article on Transnational Progressivism need to include where Fonte got his PhD from, and his public appearances on C-SPAN? Seems like this could be cut at least in half. Mwphil (talk) 14:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]