A fact from Transmission electron microscopy DNA sequencing appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
The table at the bottom may have issues, i.e. the throughput for Illumina may be much too low (2 orders of magnitude?) and that for PacBio much too high (1 order of magnitude?). Are the accuracies comparable? I think not. And the costs may be off? Frankatca (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that the workflow section on labelling is missing any references in steps 1,2 and 3. Just appears to be stated fact without anything to back for further reading. There are lots of references in the page but you would have to dig through them.tonfind where any of these are actually from. So there's no way to know if the statements (i.e. labelling) are true or not. Ouetis logos (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]