Talk:Transliminality
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This sounds very much like a euphemism for Scale 8 of the MMPI.
Concerns about a conspiracy on this article
[edit]I have been rather concerned about what some might consider a violation of NPOV - the edits that some one appears to have a penchant for making about Thalbourne being "fooled by Project Alpha". Aside from whether this violates NPOV (after all, one might be skeptical that Wikipedia really does endorse a "neutral point of view") it concerns me that who ever puts this edit in never seems to cite a source for it.What is more, even if Thalbourne having been "fooled by Project Alpha" is something that could be supported by good sources, it is poor structure to introduce this information at the start of the article - it should occur at a late stage in the article (to keep structural coherence) and the relevance to the topic should be clarified.Otherwise, this article would risk being classified as an article with an off-source topic and appear listed in that category. I made these edits, but initially I forgot to log in Wikipedia,so I shall my username here. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 92.5.61.120 (talk) 23:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
No secondary sources, notability not established
[edit]All the sources referenced in this article involve Thalbourne, they're all primary sources.This article desperately needs secondary sources to establish the notability of this article. In the case that no secondary sources are added, this article could be considered for deletion. Megaman en m (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)