Talk:Transgender archaeology

Further reading

Would it be worth adding a section for further reading? I was thinking of adding Weismantel (2013) as it appears in both the Oxford Bibliography for trans studies in anthropology (included in the external links section of the article) and for gender and archaeology. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I think that's a really good idea @Richard Nevell and would be beneficial for readers Lajmmoore (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by LunaEclipse talk 16:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that figurines from coastal Ecuador featuring masculine and feminine characteristics can be interpreted as part of a transgender approach to archaeology? Source: This article on the figurines - https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/index.php/antipoda/article/view/2089
  & this article on transgender archaeology https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/transgender-people-exist-in-history/
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Terrance (octopus)

Created by Lajmmoore (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 95 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Lajmmoore (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC).

• Will take this review. queer social science? caught my attention already :) ‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Lajmmoore. Well-written; facts are sound; sources don't raise red flags; no copyright violations; QPQ done. My only concern at the moment is with the way the hook is written. The hook is certainly interesting to me, albeit it is a little bit verbose. Perhaps something like... "... that several ambiguously gendered figurines from pre-Columbian Ecuador can be analyzed through the lens of transgender archaeology?" ‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• Thanks so much @PSA:, I appreicate the review, and agreee that your version of the hook works better, written below for promoter:

ALT1... that several ambiguously gendered figurines from pre-Columbian Ecuador can be analyzed through the lens of transgender archaeology?

-Lajmmoore (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

@Lajmmoore, thank you. To me I think we are good to go. ‍  PSA 🏕️  (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)