Talk:Transfeminism
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transfeminism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Daily page views
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
comment
[edit]beautiful article. i just wanted that said. User:Thatkid 18:14, 17 June 2005 UTC
Project ratings
[edit]Please see Talk:Transfeminism/comments
I noticed that the fact tags have been replaced with links. It's an improvment, but such links in the text is against the manual of style. Most of them should be recast as "xxx is yyyy"[1], or "zzz claims xxx is yyy" [2] for individualistic or controvertial points. If using the same source twice, the later uses need only the ref name with /.[1]
Wiki Education assignment: University Writing 1020 Communicating Feminism MW 1 pm
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jadeevelynn, Oliviapants, Troyandabedinthemorn (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cluxenberg, Runmiaogwu, SweetandSaltyGrrl, Mcolonia12.
— Assignment last updated by Cjsmith7 (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)