Talk:Transfeminine
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Transgender Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Transgender |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AmyR7.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Transwikify to wiktionary
[edit]This article is never going to be more than a definition, since if it gets any bigger, it will immediately become a merge candidate for Trans woman. If it doesn't get bigger, it will always just be a definition, but since Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this type of article does not belong.
Conclusion: we should transwikify this and merge to Wiktionary:transfeminine. Mathglot (talk) 03:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Mathglot and Crossroads: To continue a discussion we were having on Wiktionary: at this point, I don't think there's anything vital in this article that would need to be transwiki-ed over, especially if this article is not entirely deleted/made inaccessible, but instead merely hidden in the edit history underneath a redirect (so that the content is still citable and accessible for attribution/licensing, etc), like Transmasculine. It seems like there may not be enough sources which primarily/in-depth focus on the topic, for it to merit its own encyclopedia article at this time, so I would suggest reducing it to a redirect to Non-binary gender and summarizing it in a sentence in that article and in the Trans woman article: how about a sentence along the lines of "
Individuals who were assigned male at birth but align more closely with the feminine side of the gender spectrum, but who are not women, are referred to as transfeminine.
" (Or, if sources would support a slightly different wording, then "...are not necessarily women" or "...are not necessarily or exclusively women", or whatever.) And of course, that could be followed by a period or semicolon and then a similar mention of "transmasculine". (I am inclined to think Non-binary gender may be a better redirect target for Transmasculine, too, btw... but in any event they should surely either both point to "Non-binary gender" or both point to their corresponding "Trans ___" articles.) -sche (talk) 18:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)