Talk:Training and Doctrine Command (Nigeria)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	African military history task force

Africa: Nigeria Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nigeria portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nigeria.

This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realize, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Assessment[edit]

B Class assessment:

B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
- Fail. Naked URLs.
B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
- Where do they get their beans, bullet, and band aids? What kind(s) of equipment do they have/command?
B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
- Lacks history section. Though relatively new, TRADOC should have a "creation story", at least.
- Also lacks Talk page (which I am founding).
- Bibliography?
B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
- Passes.
B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
- Has info box. Are other graphics available? Still, passes.

At best, this is a Start Class article.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]