Talk:Toy army of Peter the Great

Russia: History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Military history: Russian & Soviet Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Hi

i want to be a famous like soulja boy...please help me how to find out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nappyboyswag (talk • contribs) 14:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Removed the strange bit in the 'References' section, since it contradicted the article itself and, as far as I can tell, was mostly unsourced stuff somebody probably made up on their own, and rather badly at that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.18.191 (talk) 16:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit AGAIN

I have, again, removed the contradictory article (a badly worded one, at that). The article in question takes a stance which is contradictory to every other source I have read, including the ones listed in the sources on this page. It's also just a copy/paste from eNotes.

I'd also add that this page seems to have a real problem with this information being consistently edited back in. Perhaps some higher-level intervention is required, given the importance of this topic to the history of the time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.223.222.44 (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; at present the article presents ludicrous misinformation of the sort that shouldn't last a day on Wikipedia, but I don't have the time and energy to dig up proper sources and fight an edit war with someone determined to have their point of view prevail. Languagehat (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]