Talk:Towards a Global Ethic: An Initial Declaration
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No criticism ?
[edit]No one criticized this declaration ? Just ignored it ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.205.142.75 (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
The following link is dead and was removed; I couldn't find a direct substitute:
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Towards a Global Ethic: An Initial Declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927144809/http://globalethic.org/Center/kung.htm to http://globalethic.org/Center/kung.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The Golden Rule and Hillel's Corollary
[edit]The Golden Rule about loving one's neighbor as oneself is a fine idea that many serious moralists would subscribe to including those listed here. Yet have any of them really tried to live in this way? To do so and to share in all ones worldly goods is that which only a saint can achieve. When the sage Hillel the Elder (as dual head of the Sanhedrin at about the year zero CE) was asked by a taunter to explain the Jewish Law or Torah "whilst standing on one leg", Hillel's partner in this leader's role had the taunter thrown out. But Hillel was more tolerant and proclaimed: "What is hateful to yourself, do not do it to your neighbor--the rest is commentary, now go and study (it)."
This principle of not causing offense is a great improvement on the original Golden Rule, although it is implied by it but not regularly stated. My point being that it is far more practical a way to behave in an ethical way, without having to be like a saint. For example, every time we make an journey by a petroleum-powered car, when could walk, we are polluting the air and causing offense of an unnecessary kind. On matters as simple as this we should set ourselves standards according to Hillel which are seemingly outside of the basis of the Golden Rule as it is normally understood. Therefore this principle should be used to replace the first of the list of ethical rules given in the original article. Macrocompassion (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Culture Award of German Freemasons
[edit]The related notice could be directly added to the main article Hans Küng, but it concerns specifically his foundation of the Global Ethic Foundation. So far, the current WP article seems to be the most pertaining to that content. The source is provided by the German website kath.net/, while a translation into English is available in freemasonrywatch.org. The part related to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church can be moved in the homonym article.Theologian81sp (talk) 11:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)