Talk:Totontepec Mixe

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mesoamerica (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica

Link to Schoenhals dictionary

Someone listed the Schoenhals Mixe dictionary as a reference. This dictionary is available in a free online version at http://www.sil.org/mexico/mixe/mixe-totontepec/S014a-VocMixeFacs-mto.htm. May I suggest that a link be provided to this page? (I shouldn't do it myself since I'm responsible for posting the online version.) AlbertBickford (talk) 22:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So far no response to the request. On further thought, I'm guessing that adding a link to a work that some other editor had already cited would not be controversial and thus not a violation of COI. Therefore, I went ahead and added the link myself. If anyone objects, please note that here and contact me on my talk page. AlbertBickford (talk) 08:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]