This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:42, December 30, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
The article says "realistic (singular) potentials" but T. Kato did not have the opinion that the singular Coulomb potential is "real", rather he thought exactly the otherway round: The singular potential is an approximation to something "real" that can reflect additional structure. My claim comes from the following passage:
"In this sense the Coulomb potential can be regarded as a faithful and convenient approximation to the real potential in atomic systems." --(T. Kato, Fundamental properties of Hamiltonian operators of Schrödinger type, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1951) 195-211, last page)
If agreement on this can be met this should maybe changed (also in the german version) because there is sometimes a strange and harmful attitude in the physics community of Coulomb potentials being "real". Mpenz (talk) 11:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]