Talk:Torsion (algebra)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Torsion (algebra). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Example 1
example 1 is wrong - take Z/8 as a free Z/8-module. Then the module generated by the element 2 has a nonzero annihilator. 69.203.194.3 22:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Torsion only behaves well over domains (which was reflected in the definition in the article), I've corrected the example accordingly. Arcfrk 00:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- On a closer look, for a general ring (not a domain), the definition of torsion is modified so that only non-zero divisors matter (last paragraph of the definition). So this is not a counterexample (4 annihilates the submodule (2), but 4 is not invertible in the ring). In fact, the statement as given was correct. Arcfrk 03:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Unfocused?
This article feels unfocused. Shouldn't this be turned into a disambig page or something? A torsion module is important enough for its article. So are torsion points in abelian varieties. -- Taku (talk) 00:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, "torsion" is pretty vague. When I think of torsion, the things that come to mind is the torsion submodule, and torsion theories, which are rather advanced theories of noncommutative localization. Rschwieb (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)