Torrens Transit is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This is not the Torrens Transit complaints department. Please do not insert your personal opinion about their services into the article. If you add such potentially controversial content, please back it up with reliable sources. Thanks. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is not personal opinion. The specific services mentioned are routinely late. Many customers complain about the reliability of the services, as do some staff. The company rarely if ever responds to requests why this is so. How is suppressing fact objective or balanced viewpoint? This may not be a complaints dept, but it should not be an advertisement either. I am not confident that someone who appears to be resident in the EU is sufficiently well versed in the local affairs of Adelaide to be able to judge as to whether the facts presented are factual, controversial or likely to be crontoversial. In this city stating the buses are frequently late is like stating th sun rises every morning. i.e. not controversial, but accepted fact. In any case persons with a dissenting view can always present their better argued viewpoint and/or evidence and thereby evolve the article. I have every intention of reverting my edit unless you present evidence the facts I have presented are not correct evidence you have local relevant local knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.103.16 (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Have to agree with B. Wolterding, I'm afraid. I looked at the edit, and it was very biased, let alone poorly written. I caught the M44 at around 7:30-8am before, and it was usually on time, because I wasn't late for where I needed to be. Douglas C (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
