Jump to content

Talk:Tornado over Kansas/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 02:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 


Observations

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • Prose is good and clear; article follows Manual of Style.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  • References directly address the painting. Reference 2 is an excellent introduction to this artist and his work.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • A good blend of history, appreciation and criticism of this painting.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  • NPOV is preserved.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Article shows no history of edit warring.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • Image = public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.
  1. Overall:

 

 Passed