Talk:Torch Computers

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Not a copy violation

I saw this link "Computing History - Torch Computers Ltd" and thought at first that this Wikipedia article might be a copyright violation. However at the bottom of the page it says:

"This information from Wikipedia has kindly been provided by Jon Dane of Torch Computers Ltd"

So it seems that the managing director of the current Torch Computer Ltd thinks this article is acceptable! -- PBS (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, with so many people these days relying on WP as a reference, it can be difficult to tell which came first sometimes. Still it's nice to see some of my words being used as an "official history" of Torch! Letdorf (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]