Talk:Topping out
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Merge topping off ---> topping out
[edit]The merge tag has been on this article since April 2008. I am in favor of merging this article into the Topping out article. While both terms are commonly used, "Topping out" is the term more commonly used on the Internet. Here's the comparison in number of pages:
- Topping out (432,000)
- Topping off (364,000)
Please indicate your support or lack of support below: I will tally this in one week's time (midnight August 5, 2008 (UTC).
- Support - Since "topping out" is more used, I favor merging this article into "Topping out. Sunray (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I studied architecture and work in construction support services in the UK. I've only ever heard it refered to as "topping out". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.32.134 (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
File:Topping off liberty hotel.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Topping off liberty hotel.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Topping off liberty hotel.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Topping out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080928203019/http://www.nationalreview.com:80/comment/wood200312230101.asp?category=all%20projects&id=23 to http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/wood200312230101.asp?category=all%20projects&id=23
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Topping out in China? Please advise.
[edit]The History section says it originated in Scandinavia and is now common in European countries and the English-speaking West. But among the photos there is a topped-out building in China. Is this from Western influence or do they have a local tradition? 27.32.62.224 (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- More thoughts:
- Surely it is a natural human impulse to have some sort of recognition when a building reaches a stage of completion. But this need have no relation to what was originally a quasi-religious ceremony with the tree. Is only the latter "Topping Out", and the other could be "Completion Ceremony"? But I am only arguing from common sense and have no sources, so this makes it Original Research. But I think that not making some distinction amounts to misleading the reader by omission. So what is the resolution? 27.32.62.224 (talk) 06:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)