Talk:Tool Academy season 1

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highs and Elimination Table

The contestants who received praise should be shown as it gives the viewer of the page more information on who is doing well on the show even if they did not win the challenge.

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew097 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current situation seems to be that the formatting is following previous Charm School shows, which doesn't have an elimination order. I don't care which format is used, so long as it's consistent. I saved the elimination order in a comment in the Episode 2 section. We would need the call-out order for Episode 1 to complete such a table. I also saved the top three from the Challenge in a comment (in case it is needed for an episode summary).

However, I am strongly against the use of excessive coloring. Footnotes are much better. See the WP:MOS section on colors. Plastikspork (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there is now a call-out order table and footnotes for "commendations". Plastikspork (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All riiight! Chastayo (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The way the table is set up, it list the names in alphabetical order in the first column. The rest of the column have names and show the eliminations. The first column really is unneeded and pretty much just a confusion. I do not know how to format it without screwing up the page. Can someone please change this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.91.5 (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

I think the article should quote the host's standard words he tells the tool when the tool is eliminated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.132.137 (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It's not necessary. Plastikspork (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree w/Plastikspork. Unnecessary, non-iconic or significant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.43.120 (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change of Elimination Table?

I'm curious to know why it was changed. Chastayo (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals. Changes have been reverted. Plastikspork (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever

Keeps changing Matsuflex to the winner needs to quit! There is no proof as to him winning. This is vandalism. If your favorite did not win, then don't change the wikipedia page. We are trying to keep things 100% real. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.108.95 (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Season Two

Can someone people put in Tool Academy (Season 2)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need seperate articles for each season of this show?

Nothing against the show, but can't both seasons be under one article? Do all TV shows get separate listings by seasons?

It depends on the length of the article and the number of seasons. As far as I can tell there is no reason to merge them at the moment. But, they could be merged later if necessary. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why Was the Call-Out Order Removed?

There was no reason-there was a call-out order in every episode but 7, and it provided valuable information that took up no extra space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.27.131.215 (talk) 14:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]