Talk:Tony Veitch

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Tony Veitch be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Tense of Article

As much Tony is no longer a broadcaster of New Zealand television, he is very much still alive. Perhaps the tense of the article should be edited to reflect this, using IS rather than WAS. - typera 17:00pm 17/07/08 NZT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typera (talk • contribs) 05:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Or use "is a former ... broadcaster". Even better may be to find some biographically details about him and write an introductory statement independent of the recent issues. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

he still is a broadcaster even though he is currently unemployed (publicly)Tshiels1 (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just visited this page for the first time, and immediately took exception to the statement "Tony Colin Veitch is a New Zealand sports broadcaster". I disagree. Tony Veitch *was* a former sports broadcaster since he is now unemployed. If you want to avoid the word "was" then I suggest that the opening sentence should be reworded. How about "Tony Veitch, a former New Zealand sports broadcaster, ..."

(Aside: Consider a person who was formerly a police officer. It would be incorrect to state "Person X is a police officer". How about the statement "Helen Clark is the prime minister of New Zealand". No - Helen Clark *was* the prime minister of New Zealand.)

Article balance

I have asked at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Tony Veitch for some guidance on how to handle the balance of this article. While the events of the past year have been very important, I'm not sure that they should dominate the article to quite the extent that they currently do.-gadfium 05:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added the expand-section macro to the Broadcasting section, but is was subsequently removed by User:Lambert611/edits who said removed note to expand section as Veitch is far more famous for his assault on his partner & guilty plea. Surely that's not a reason to have a single-issue biographical article? Stuartyeates (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Court Case

Is that tag appropriate? The main case is now over. Tshiels1 (talk) 07:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tony Veitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recurrent vandalism

Could this page be semi-protected (is that the right term?!) as it is getting considerable vandalism; I remember that in October 2015 there was a similar spate of vandalism. In both cases it's coincided with statements from Veitch being published in the media. MurielMary (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Densem comment.

That Yvonne Densem link is now dead and her comment cannot be supported. I can't find another link that contains her comment. Should her comment be deleted? Dairyflat (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]